| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
J Epilepsy Res > Volume 5(2); 2015 > Article
Choi, Lee, Shon, and Son: Long-Term Migration of a Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Lead in the Third Ventricle Caused by Cerebral Atrophy in a Patient with Anterior Thalamic Nucleus DBS


The long-term (5-years) antiepileptic effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) against refractory epilepsy has been reported. However, experience with ANT DBS for epilepsy is limited, and so hardware complications and technical problems related to ANT DBS are unclear. We report the case of a 57-year-old male who underwent re-implantation of a DBS lead in the left ANT because of lead migration into the third ventricle detected 8 years after the first DBS, and which was caused by the significant enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles. After re-implantation, the patient showed a mechanically-related antiepileptic effect and a prominent driving response of the electroencephalography was verified. We speculate that progressive dilatation of the ventricle and shallow, insufficient implantation of the lead during the initial ANT DBS may have caused migration of the DBS lead. Because dilatation of the ventricle could progress years after DBS in a patient with chronic epilepsy, regular follow-up imaging is warranted in ANT DBS patients with an injured, atrophied brain.


Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is commonly accepted as a safe and effective treatment for many neurological diseases including movement disorders, refractory epilepsies, psychiatric diseases and pain disorders.14 DBS of the anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT) was recently reported as beneficial for patients with intractable epilepsy in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.5
Many studies have discussed the complications of DBS on classical targets. However, because of limited experience with ANT DBS for epilepsy, its technical problems are rarely reported and unclear. In this case report, we describe a patient with a unique complication after ANT DBS, whose DBS lead had migrated into ventricle, detected 8 years after implantation.


A 57-year-old male was admitted for progressive loss of anti-epileptic effect from bilateral ANT DBS during the last 6 months prior to admission. His first seizure developed at the age of 10. Since then, he suffered from chronic epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures and had regularly taken antiepileptic medications. A huge left frontal lobe meningioma detected due to increasing seizure frequency was removed in 2001, when he was 43 year of age. Seizures did not decrease. After about 6 years of multiple antiepileptic drug treatment by an experienced epileptologist in a tertiary hospital, he was diagnosed with intractable bilateral frontal lobe epilepsy. He was considered to have medically intractable epilepsy and was evaluated with presurgical studies, including video-electroencephalography (EEG), ictal and interictal single-photon emission computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography. Bilateral ANT DBS was performed in one hospital in 2007. According to the medical records and old brain images, the previous DBS had been performed with a bilateral transventricular trajectory. Bilateral DBS leads (Model 3387; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Soletra (Model 7426; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) pulse generators were implanted. He had undergone replacement of bilateral implantable pulse generators (IPGs) in 2011 due to IPG depletion. ANT DBS had been very effective for 8 years. The patient had one or fewer seizures a month. However, his seizure frequency had increased gradually to three or more times a month, since 6 months before admission. His left IPG battery was found to be depleted at the outpatient clinic 2 weeks before admission. Admission was decided to evaluate shortened longevity of the IPG and poor antiepileptic effect of DBS.
He had no major head trauma history that could have affected the function of the DBS system. Plain x-rays were taken to determine the integrity of bilateral leads and extension lines. Brain MRI showed that the left DBS lead was not located in the left ANT, but in the third ventricle (Fig. 1A). The third and lateral ventricles had enlarged significantly and bilateral Sylvian fissures had widened without any evident obstructive lesion in the cerebrospinal fluid pathway, compared to the MRI performed in 2007 (Fig. 2). We estimated the degree of ventricular enlargement and created fusion images using Framelink® navigation software (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) to identify the direction and degree of lead migration. To make fusion images, postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, taken after the first DBS in 2007, was merged on the stereotactic MRI taken for re-visionary ANT DBS in 2015. Other areas in the CT scan, except the DBS lead, were made invisible by controlling the contrast and transparency of the image (Fig. 3).
The patient required re-implantation of a new DBS lead in the left ANT and replacement of the IPG. We removed the DBS lead and performed a MRI-guided, transventricular ANT DBS on the left side. Postoperative CT scan was taken for detecting any acute complication, and then it was fused with the preoperative stereotactic MRI to confirm the location of the electrodes. After verification of the EEG driving response and conducting test stimulations for 2 days, the IPG was replaced.
Comparison of the brain MRIs taken in 2007 and 2015 revealed that the Evans Index, the cella media index and the maximal width of the third ventricle had increased from 0.254 to 0.267, 0.142 to 0.204, 7.7 to 14.5 mm, respectively. The CT scan taken after the first DBS in 2007 showed that only the most distal electrode had definite contact with the ANT parenchyma (Fig. 1B), while the others were in the ventricle (Fig. 1C). We fused the CT scan with the recent MRI taken in 2015 using the navigation software. The fusion images showed that the left lead had migrated medially into the third ventricle and the right lead had migrated laterally during the intervening 8 years (Fig. 3).
After reimplanting the ANT DBS lead on the left side, the old DBS lead was explored. No sign of loosening or slippage was observed near the burr hole site. Rather, it was firmly attached to the burr hole with thick adhesions and new bone formation. After a simple adhesiolysis between the lead and surrounding tissue, the lead was easily removed without much risk of intracerebral hemorrhage as it was in the ventricle, rather than within the thalamic parenchyma. After removing the lead and the extension line, they were carefully inspected to confirm no hardware damage.
Postoperative CT scan taken after revision DBS showed no acute hemorrhage. The scan was merged with the preoperative stereotactic MRI to confirm the final electrode locations. The fusion image revealed that successful targeting was achieved with sufficient contact to the ANT parenchyma (Fig. 4). The patient showed a mechanical, antiepileptic effect after re-implantation of the left ANT lead, and a prominent EEG driving response was verified. After 2 days of test stimulation, the IPG was replaced. Chronic stimulation was provided with improved epileptic seizure frequency.


The ANT is a relay station of limbic system in the human brain. It receives the mammillothalamic tract and projects to the cingulate gyrus.6 Electrical stimulation of the ANT to treat epilepsy was introduced by Sussman et al.7 and by Cooper et al.8 Recently, the SANTE multi-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study (electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy) demonstrated the efficacy of ANT DBS to reduce epileptic seizures.5 The authors reported paresthesia, implant site pain and infection as the most common device-related adverse effects. Initially mislocated electrodes were 8.2% of their cases, but the details were not described.5
In the present case, it was obvious that the lead had spontaneously migrated due to the significant enlargement of the ventricle because the patient had no definite history of trauma and no securing failure was observed near the burr hole site intraoperatively. The CT scan taken immediately after the first DBS in 2007 showed that only the distal part of the left DBS lead had contact with the ANT parenchyma (Fig. 1B and 1C). The targeting was correct, but the contact surface for the electrodes was insufficient. In fusion images the left lead was revealed to have migrated medially into the third ventricle and the right lead had migrated laterally (Fig. 3). We speculate that the left lead probably moved laterally due to laterally acting pressure caused by enlargement of the ventricle. Then, the lead pulled out of the thalamic parenchyma, which eventually caused its medially directed migration, while the right lead remained in the laterally moved location in the thalamus. We think that it was caused by a shallow and insufficient lead implantation.
A transventricular trajectory is usually avoided in DBS for classical targets, such as the subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus interna, and ventral nuclei of the thalamus.9 Ventricular puncture during the surgery may induce a brain shift due to loss of cerebrospinal fluid, which is a common cause of mistargeting. In addition, a DBS lead is not rigid enough to pierce through the ventricle and may proceed in the wrong direction in a curvelinear shape along the ventricular wall during the implantation.9 Moreover, many vascular structures in the ventricles can cause acute hemorrhage.10 Therefore, neurosurgeons carefully perform DBS so as not to interrupt the ventricular wall. However, transventricular trajectory is frequently chosen for ANT DBS because of its proximity to the ventricle.6 The medial dorsal nucleus of thalamus also has profound projections to the cerebral cortex, which can be affected by a more anteriorly located trajectory, and which may lead to a synergetic effect with ANT stimulation.11
During the 8 years, the patient had undergone significant atrophic brain changes (Figs. 2A and 2B). Because the human brain changes with time, it is important for physicians to understand and predict the absolute or relative changes in electrode locations, which may cause unexpected side effects or loss of benefits.12 According to a longitudinal cross-sectional study, the volume of the cerebral cortex and subcortical structures decrease, and the ventricular volume increases during healthy aging.13 In that study, the volumes of the inferior lateral (5.47%), lateral (4.40%), and third (3.07%) ventricles increased significantly, but the size of the fourth (0.71%) ventricle did not change.13 Studies have evaluated the influence of aging on structures, such as the subventricular and basal ganglia, the thalamus, and the brain stem region, where most DBS targets are located.1315
The atrophic changes in the brain of a patient with epilepsy are more severe. In a volumetric MRI study, both the gray and white matter had more atrophy beyond the known epileptogenic area in the temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patient group, compared to that in a healthy group.16 Atrophy progresses more significantly compared to that observed during normal aging in patients with pharmacoresistant TLE.17 In the present case, in addition, surgery of the huge frontal meningioma in 2001, may have contributed the acceleration of atrophic changes of the brain by inducing traumatic injury. Therefore, regular brain imaging studies can be helpful to identify possible changes in electrode locations of ANT DBS, because many causes, such as aging, epileptic seizure and brain injury, can provoke and accelerate progressive ventricular dilatation and cerebral atrophy.
In conclusion, the progressive dilatation of the ventricles and shallow, insufficient implantation of the initial ANT DBS may have caused migration of the DBS lead. We recommend regular follow-up imaging studies as well as measuring impedance and battery status of the implanted device, because ventricular dilatation and cerebral atrophy can progress years after ANT DBS in an epilepsy patient with injured, atrophied brain.

Figure 1.
(A) Magnetic resonance image taken before the revisionary deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) in 2015. Tip of the left DBS lead is observed in the third ventricular space. (B, C) Computed tomography scan taken after first ANT DBS placement in 2007. Only the most distal electrode was located within the thalamus (B), while the others were in the ventricle (C). The white arrow indicates the location of left DBS electrode at the level of the axial image.
Figure 2.
Preoperative stereotactic magnetic resonance images taken for the first deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) in 2007 (A) and for the revisionary ANT DBS in 2015 (B). The third ventricle (arrow) had enlarged significantly and bilateral Sylvian fissures (white arrows) had widened evidently during the intervening 8 years.
Figure 3.
Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan taken after the first deep brain stimulation (DBS) in 2007 was merged on the magnetic resonance image taken before the revisionary anterior thalamic nucleus DBS in 2015 using navigation software. Other areas of the CT scan, except the DBS lead, were made invisible by controlling the contrast and transparency of the CT image. The left DBS lead had migrated medially into the third ventricle and the right lead had migrated laterally during the intervening 8 years. This image is a screenshot of surgical navigation system showing an operative view which has opposite left and right side to common brain images. The left side of the image is the left side of the brain. The white contour indicates the location of the old DBS lead in 2007 and the black indicates its recent location in 2015.
Figure 4.
Postoperative fused computed tomography and magnetic resonance images after the revisionary anterior nucleus of the thalamus deep brain stimulation (ANT DBS) on the left side in 2015. Successful targeting was achieved with sufficient contact of electrode to thalamic parenchyma of the ANT. This image is a screenshot of surgical navigation system showing an operative view which has opposite left and right side to common brain images. The left side of the image is the left side of the brain.


1. Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of thalamic stimulation for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2015;84:1017–25.
crossref pmid
2. Kenney C, Simpson R, Hunter C, et al. Short-term and long-term safety of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg. 2007;106:621–5.
crossref pmid
3. Vidailhet M, Jutras MF, Grabli D, Roze E. Deep brain stimulation for dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:1029–42.
crossref pmid
4. Lyons MK. Deep brain stimulation: Current and future clinical applications. Mayo Clinic Proceed. 2011;86:662–72.
5. Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, et al. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51:899–908.
crossref pmid
6. Vanderah TW, Gould DJ. The thalamus and internal capsule. Vanderah TW, Gould DJ, editors. Nolte’s the human brain. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. p. 394–418.

7. Sussman NM, Goldman HW, Jackel RA, et al. Anterior thalamus stimulation in medically intractable epilepsy, part II: preliminary clinical results. Epilepsia. 1988;29:677

8. Cooper IS, Upton AR, Amin I, Garnett S, Brown GM, Springman M. Evoked metabolic responses in the limbic-striate system produced by stimulation of anterior thalamic nucleus in man. Int J Neurol. 1984;18:179–87.
9. Miyagi Y, Shima F, Sasaki T. Brain shift: An error factor during implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:989–97.
crossref pmid
10. Ben-Haim S, Asaad WF, Gale JT, Eskandar EN. Risk factors for hemorrhage during microelectrode-guided deep brain stimulation and the introduction of an improved microelectrode design. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:754–62.
crossref pmid
11. Lee KJ, Shon YM, Cho CB. Long-term outcome of anterior thalamic nucleus stimulation for intractable epilepsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012;90:379–85.
crossref pmid
12. Martinez-Ramirez D, Morishita T, Zeilman PR, Peng-Chen Z, Foote KD, Okun MS. Atrophy and other potential factors affecting long term deep brain stimulation response: A case series. PloS one. 2014;9:e111561
13. Fjell AM, Walhovd KB, Fennema-Notestine C, et al. One-year brain atrophy evident in healthy aging. J Neurosci. 2009;29:15223–31.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Munivenkatappa A, Bagepally BS, Saini J, Pal PK. In vivo age-related changes in cortical, subcortical nuclei, and subventricular zone: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Aging Dis. 2013;4:65–75.
pmid pmc
15. Sullivan EV, Rosenbloom M, Serventi KL, Pfefferbaum A. Effects of age and sex on volumes of the thalamus, pons, and cortex. Neurobiol aging. 2004;25:185–92.
crossref pmid
16. Bernasconi N, Duchesne S, Janke A, Lerch J, Collins DL, Bernasconi A. Whole-brain voxel-based statistical analysis of gray matter and white matter in temporal lobe epilepsy. NeuroImage. 2004;23:717–23.
crossref pmid
17. Bernhardt BC, Worsley KJ, Kim H, Evans AC, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of atrophy in pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2009;72:1747–54.
crossref pmid pmc
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
XML Download  XML Download
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Supplement  Supplement
Editorial Office
KCC Parktown 101-308, Mallijae-ro 185, Jung-Gu, Seoul, Korea
TEL : +82-2072-2237   FAX : +82-2-362-9663   E-mail : 40403@snuh.org

Copyright© Korean Epilepsy Society.              Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers